Power
Credible path to ≥100 MW
120 MW identified
3 sources · Q2 2026Screen a parcel, a shortlist or a whole area against your minimum requirements. DCLR shows what passes, what fails and what needs validation before further due diligence.

No known critical blocker · Next step: targeted due diligence
A parcel can look promising and still fail on power, fibre, water, access, planning or environmental constraints. DCLR brings those early signals together before detailed due diligence begins.

Every candidate is assessed against the same configured criteria, so the shortlist is consistent, comparable and explainable.
Set the geography, capacity, timing and non-negotiable constraints.
Assess an area, parcel set or shortlist across the relevant data layers.
See what passes, what fails and where evidence is incomplete.
Advance, hold or rule out each candidate before further due diligence.

Two domains on watch — Planning and Water flagged for validation.
DCLR tests the infrastructure, land and risk conditions that can qualify, delay or rule out a site—then shows which result needs attention next.
Credible path to ≥100 MW
120 MW identified
3 sources · Q2 2026Diverse routes within 5 km
3 routes confirmed
2 sources · Q1 2026Cooling pathway available
Moderate stress index
2 sources · Q3 2025Industrial zoning confirmed
Bedrijventerrein — permitted
1 source · Q4 2025No protected areas within 5 km
Nearest Natura 2000: 6.8 km
2 sources · Q1 2026Motorway access within 3 km
A1 junction 1.5 km south
1 source · Q2 2026≥30 ha, single ownership
42 ha, single parcel
1 source · Q4 2025Population ≥50k within 30 km
Amersfoort 158k, Utrecht 360k
1 source · 2025DCLR does not replace technical due diligence. It helps it begin on the strongest candidates, with known risks, evidence and open questions already structured.
Screen a defined geography against infrastructure, land and risk requirements.
Test each candidate against the same configured criteria and expose pass, review or fail.
Compare surviving candidates on a common basis with evidence behind every position.
Carry evidence, assumptions and validation priorities into the next stage of work.
Screen a defined geography against infrastructure, land and risk requirements.
Test a supplied set of parcels consistently and expose the reason behind each position.
Test an offered parcel against the minimum requirements and identify the questions still to answer.
Every result shows what meets the requirement, what does not, what remains unknown and what should be validated next. Sources, dates and assumptions stay connected to each finding.

DCLRCONFIDENTIALIndustrieweg 47, 3812 KS Amersfoort, Netherlands
Amersfoort East presents a strong infrastructure profile with excellent grid proximity and fibre diversity. Water pathway and planning capacity are the two domains flagged for validation before proceeding to DD1.
Site overview — Amersfoort EastIssue: Water stress index moderate for the region. Cooling pathway not yet confirmed.
Mitigation: Validate water availability and cooling strategy at DD1.
Issue: Two power corridors identified; third route requires new trenching.
Mitigation: Assess feasibility and cost of third diverse route at DD1.
Issue: Nearest solar PV installation 8.2 km away. No on-site renewable potential identified.
Mitigation: Explore PPA options and rooftop solar feasibility at DD1.
42 hectares of flat industrial-zoned land. Rectangular parcel suitable for multiple hyperscale halls.
Site boundary and indicative test fit overlaySingle ownership parcel. Flat elevation profile with no significant delta.
Elevation profile and land parcel boundaryNo protected areas within 5 km. Municipal zoning supports industrial development.
Protected areas and planning constraint overlayAmersfoort city centre 4.2 km west. A1 motorway access 1.5 km south.
Regional water board manages supply. Wastewater treatment 3.2 km north.
Water infrastructure and catchment overlayTenneT 380 kV substation 1.8 km west. Grid connection capacity under review.
Power infrastructure and grid proximity overlayGas network available. Three fibre routes confirmed. Low ATEX exposure.
Each candidate is evaluated against a transparent scoring model shaped around market, capacity and risk priorities. Scores are weighted for likely critical impact on data centre development. The DD0 assessment represents a high-level review based solely on publicly available and open-source data.
A Site Due Diligence (DD1) study will be required to assess the site's suitability with greater accuracy and detail.
Infrastructure constraint analysisConfigure DCLR around a real geography, parcel set or project brief. Review the screening results with the team, then reuse the criteria and workflow across future opportunities.
Geography, capacity, timing, non-negotiable constraints and risk appetite.
A qualified shortlist, evidence-linked first assessment and a reusable workflow.
Clear answers to the questions that matter before you commit time or capital.
No. DCLR is an early screening and qualification layer. It helps decide which sites merit further technical, legal and commercial due diligence and what that work should investigate first.
A whole area, a defined set of candidate parcels or a single offered site.
Yes. Criteria, thresholds and priorities can be shaped around the market, capacity need, project brief and risk appetite.
DCLR marks the result as unknown or requiring validation. Missing evidence should never be treated as a pass.
Yes, where supplied data is compatible with the screening model. Its source and date should remain visible in the result.

DCLRDATA CENTER LOCATION RESEARCHWe will configure the minimum requirements around a live opportunity and walk through the passes, blockers, unknowns, evidence and next validation actions.
Request a private screeningDCLR supports professional judgement and further due diligence; it does not replace them.